<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1779 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467115</link>
    <description>Determination of benami status turned on contemporaneous transactional facts: timing of LLP incorporation, minimal capital contribution, mismatch between recorded cheques and encashments, absence of sale-deed or contemporaneous evidence for alleged prior advance, and a post-attachment memorandum not relied on at acquisition. The legal principle applied treats unexplained payments furnished by beneficial persons as funds used to acquire immovable property in the name of another, making the nominal owner a benamidar and the payors beneficial owners; accordingly the attachment under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions regime was confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 20:54:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1779 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467115</link>
      <description>Determination of benami status turned on contemporaneous transactional facts: timing of LLP incorporation, minimal capital contribution, mismatch between recorded cheques and encashments, absence of sale-deed or contemporaneous evidence for alleged prior advance, and a post-attachment memorandum not relied on at acquisition. The legal principle applied treats unexplained payments furnished by beneficial persons as funds used to acquire immovable property in the name of another, making the nominal owner a benamidar and the payors beneficial owners; accordingly the attachment under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions regime was confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>