<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 144 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50441</link>
    <description>For the period before 29-6-1995, no time limit governed taking Modvat credit on duty-paying documents, and the later six-month limit in Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was not retrospective. Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was held inapplicable to the taking or recovery of Modvat credit. Credit taken before the amendment could not be denied merely because the documents were several years old, and the credit was therefore valid in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:02:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 144 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50441</link>
      <description>For the period before 29-6-1995, no time limit governed taking Modvat credit on duty-paying documents, and the later six-month limit in Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was not retrospective. Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was held inapplicable to the taking or recovery of Modvat credit. Credit taken before the amendment could not be denied merely because the documents were several years old, and the credit was therefore valid in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>