<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1617 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467125</link>
    <description>Whether an addition under the law for unexplained investment can rest solely on documents seized during a survey and a statement recorded under the statutory information-gathering provision was analysed: the principles applied require independent corroboration of statements under the information provision and that survey entries lacking key particulars or showing internal discrepancies cannot alone sustain an addition. The assessing officer&#039;s failure to conduct independent enquiries, verify summoned parties, or produce corroborative material meant the documentary matrix did not support the unexplained-investment addition, with the operative effect being deletion of the addition in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 20:54:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1617 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467125</link>
      <description>Whether an addition under the law for unexplained investment can rest solely on documents seized during a survey and a statement recorded under the statutory information-gathering provision was analysed: the principles applied require independent corroboration of statements under the information provision and that survey entries lacking key particulars or showing internal discrepancies cannot alone sustain an addition. The assessing officer&#039;s failure to conduct independent enquiries, verify summoned parties, or produce corroborative material meant the documentary matrix did not support the unexplained-investment addition, with the operative effect being deletion of the addition in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>