https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50438 Suspension of a customs house agent licence under Regulation 21(1) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 was challenged as prima facie unlawful for non-compliance with Regulation 23, which requires notice and an opportunity of hearing. On a prima facie reading, the absence of notice and hearing supported the contention that the suspension was not in accordance with law, and the alternative argument that the Commissioner acted under Regulation 21(11) was not accepted. Stay of the suspension order was therefore granted pending appeal. en-us Thu, 01 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:56:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50438 Suspension of a customs house agent licence under Regulation 21(1) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 was challenged as prima facie unlawful for non-compliance with Regulation 23, which requires notice and an opportunity of hearing. On a prima facie reading, the absence of notice and hearing supported the contention that the suspension was not in accordance with law, and the alternative argument that the Commissioner acted under Regulation 21(11) was not accepted. Stay of the suspension order was therefore granted pending appeal. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 01 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50438