https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467094 Cross-objections under Order 41 Rule 22 CPC are maintainable against appellants where relief against them is sought, but not where the objection solely challenges a co-respondent's independent right (here, a lease) and cannot be effectively interlinked with relief against the appellants; where Rule 22 is unavailable against a co-respondent, the appellate court may, subject to the presence of the original parties before it and the question arising from the lower court's judgment, exercise its discretionary power under Order 41 Rule 33 to pass any decree or order necessary to do complete justice, and the matter is to be reconsidered accordingly. en-us Wed, 28 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Mar 2026 10:35:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467094 Cross-objections under Order 41 Rule 22 CPC are maintainable against appellants where relief against them is sought, but not where the objection solely challenges a co-respondent's independent right (here, a lease) and cannot be effectively interlinked with relief against the appellants; where Rule 22 is unavailable against a co-respondent, the appellate court may, subject to the presence of the original parties before it and the question arising from the lower court's judgment, exercise its discretionary power under Order 41 Rule 33 to pass any decree or order necessary to do complete justice, and the matter is to be reconsidered accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467094