https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787450 Whether a lease deed can establish leasehold rights for CIRP inclusion was decided by reference to execution authority, proof of consideration, corporate records and pending investigations. The tribunal applied the principle that a registered instrument executed by unauthorised persons and unsupported by reliable evidence of consideration is unenforceable to establish title or leasehold rights in CIRP; contemporaneous balance sheets and conveyance deeds must corroborate transfer; and summary adjudication under IBC is constrained in fraud/forgery matters. Outcome: the lease deed was held unenforceable for confirming the corporate debtor's asset and was excluded from the Information Memorandum. en-us Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Mar 2026 08:30:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787450 Whether a lease deed can establish leasehold rights for CIRP inclusion was decided by reference to execution authority, proof of consideration, corporate records and pending investigations. The tribunal applied the principle that a registered instrument executed by unauthorised persons and unsupported by reliable evidence of consideration is unenforceable to establish title or leasehold rights in CIRP; contemporaneous balance sheets and conveyance deeds must corroborate transfer; and summary adjudication under IBC is constrained in fraud/forgery matters. Outcome: the lease deed was held unenforceable for confirming the corporate debtor's asset and was excluded from the Information Memorandum. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787450