<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 211 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787456</link>
    <description>Rejection of declared transaction value was unsustainable where the relied-upon handwritten statement was not shown to be voluntary due to language non-comprehension, downloaded electronic invoices lacked contemporaneity and corroborative particulars, and local resale invoices were disregarded without reasoned evaluation under valuation procedure standards. Re-determination using contemporaneous imports failed for want of adequate comparability and specific item particulars and absence of procedural notice. Consequently, fiscal consequences including differential duty, confiscation and penalties based on those foundations cannot be sustained; appeal relief in favour of the importer is supported on these evidentiary and procedural grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 08:30:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 211 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787456</link>
      <description>Rejection of declared transaction value was unsustainable where the relied-upon handwritten statement was not shown to be voluntary due to language non-comprehension, downloaded electronic invoices lacked contemporaneity and corroborative particulars, and local resale invoices were disregarded without reasoned evaluation under valuation procedure standards. Re-determination using contemporaneous imports failed for want of adequate comparability and specific item particulars and absence of procedural notice. Consequently, fiscal consequences including differential duty, confiscation and penalties based on those foundations cannot be sustained; appeal relief in favour of the importer is supported on these evidentiary and procedural grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>