<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 216 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787461</link>
    <description>At the discharge stage, the court must only examine whether the prosecution materials disclose a prima facie case or strong suspicion, not conduct a mini-trial. Materials including Section 108 Customs Act statements, approver statements, and CCTV-related content were treated as sufficient to justify trial, while their full evidentiary value and need for corroboration were left for trial. The charge-sheet also contained specific allegations linking the accused to illegal gratification and criminal breach of trust. Earlier quashment contentions did not displace the materials against this accused, so the discharge petition was rejected and trial was permitted to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 08:30:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 216 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787461</link>
      <description>At the discharge stage, the court must only examine whether the prosecution materials disclose a prima facie case or strong suspicion, not conduct a mini-trial. Materials including Section 108 Customs Act statements, approver statements, and CCTV-related content were treated as sufficient to justify trial, while their full evidentiary value and need for corroboration were left for trial. The charge-sheet also contained specific allegations linking the accused to illegal gratification and criminal breach of trust. Earlier quashment contentions did not displace the materials against this accused, so the discharge petition was rejected and trial was permitted to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>