<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 217 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787462</link>
    <description>Voluntary payment of differential customs duty during a DRI investigation, coupled with a request to close the investigation and no contemporaneous protest, attracts estoppel by conduct against a later refund claim. Notification No. 25/2019-Customs amended the earlier exemption notification prospectively and could not alter duty liability for earlier imports. Collection without a separate show cause notice was treated as proper where payment was voluntary and closure was sought under Section 28(2). Refund under Section 27 also requires proof that duty was not passed on to buyers; failure to disprove unjust enrichment prevents refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 08:30:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 217 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787462</link>
      <description>Voluntary payment of differential customs duty during a DRI investigation, coupled with a request to close the investigation and no contemporaneous protest, attracts estoppel by conduct against a later refund claim. Notification No. 25/2019-Customs amended the earlier exemption notification prospectively and could not alter duty liability for earlier imports. Collection without a separate show cause notice was treated as proper where payment was voluntary and closure was sought under Section 28(2). Refund under Section 27 also requires proof that duty was not passed on to buyers; failure to disprove unjust enrichment prevents refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>