<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 234 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787479</link>
    <description>Faceless assessment under the Income-tax Act requires that where a draft assessment proposes a variation prejudicial to the assessee, the National Faceless Assessment Centre must serve a show-cause notice and consider any response before finalising the assessment; omission of that mandated show-cause step constituted breach of the statutory procedure and, on that basis, the High Court quashed the assessment order and the notice of demand dated 9 June 2021 for failure to afford the required opportunity to reply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 08:30:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 234 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787479</link>
      <description>Faceless assessment under the Income-tax Act requires that where a draft assessment proposes a variation prejudicial to the assessee, the National Faceless Assessment Centre must serve a show-cause notice and consider any response before finalising the assessment; omission of that mandated show-cause step constituted breach of the statutory procedure and, on that basis, the High Court quashed the assessment order and the notice of demand dated 9 June 2021 for failure to afford the required opportunity to reply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>