https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787481 Arguable jurisdictional defects in reassessment proceedings can justify writ jurisdiction despite the availability of an alternate statutory remedy. The challenge concerned a section 148 notice said to have been issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer rather than the Faceless Assessing Officer, and a further objection that only 30 days were given to file the return although the amended provision was said to require at least three months. On those grounds, the writ petition was entertained, the petitioner was not relegated to the alternate remedy, and interim protection was granted against the reassessment order, demand notice and penalty show-cause notice. en-us Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Mar 2026 08:30:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787481 Arguable jurisdictional defects in reassessment proceedings can justify writ jurisdiction despite the availability of an alternate statutory remedy. The challenge concerned a section 148 notice said to have been issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer rather than the Faceless Assessing Officer, and a further objection that only 30 days were given to file the return although the amended provision was said to require at least three months. On those grounds, the writ petition was entertained, the petitioner was not relegated to the alternate remedy, and interim protection was granted against the reassessment order, demand notice and penalty show-cause notice. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787481