<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 237 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787482</link>
    <description>Cancellation under Section 12AA(3) requires a recorded satisfaction that a trust&#039;s or institution&#039;s activities are not genuine or not in accordance with its objects; mere surplus generation during educational activity, when invested in educational infrastructure or applied to educational objects, does not by itself justify cancellation. The interpretive rules applied under Section 10(23C) (that surplus per se is not disqualifying) are relevant only to that limited principle; they cannot be read to supplant the mandatory satisfaction standard for cancellation under Section 12AA(3). The cancellation was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 08:30:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 237 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787482</link>
      <description>Cancellation under Section 12AA(3) requires a recorded satisfaction that a trust&#039;s or institution&#039;s activities are not genuine or not in accordance with its objects; mere surplus generation during educational activity, when invested in educational infrastructure or applied to educational objects, does not by itself justify cancellation. The interpretive rules applied under Section 10(23C) (that surplus per se is not disqualifying) are relevant only to that limited principle; they cannot be read to supplant the mandatory satisfaction standard for cancellation under Section 12AA(3). The cancellation was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>