<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 130 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50428</link>
    <description>Duty demand on PVC sockets was unsustainable where the contracts and schedule of rates showed the sockets were supplied with PVC pipes and their value was already included in the composite price on which duty had been paid; the demand was therefore set aside. Penalty could not survive because the alleged resin shortage was explained as natural loss in processing and handling, and clandestine removal was not proved; the penalty was also set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:17:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 130 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50428</link>
      <description>Duty demand on PVC sockets was unsustainable where the contracts and schedule of rates showed the sockets were supplied with PVC pipes and their value was already included in the composite price on which duty had been paid; the demand was therefore set aside. Penalty could not survive because the alleged resin shortage was explained as natural loss in processing and handling, and clandestine removal was not proved; the penalty was also set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>