<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Blocking of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A sustained, but petitioner granted hearing and representation before final decision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97438</link>
    <description>Challenge to blocking of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A was rejected where inspection and recorded statements indicated availment of credit on disputed invoices; the impugned blocking was held to fall within the regulatory scheme and not amenable to interference. A jurisdictional objection that a subordinate officer effected the block was dismissed because blocking was shown to be authorised by senior officers. The court nevertheless granted liberty to the petitioner to make a representation and directed that the concerned officer hear the petitioner and decide the merits expeditiously, preferably within thirty days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 08:30:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 08:30:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Blocking of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A sustained, but petitioner granted hearing and representation before final decision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97438</link>
      <description>Challenge to blocking of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A was rejected where inspection and recorded statements indicated availment of credit on disputed invoices; the impugned blocking was held to fall within the regulatory scheme and not amenable to interference. A jurisdictional objection that a subordinate officer effected the block was dismissed because blocking was shown to be authorised by senior officers. The court nevertheless granted liberty to the petitioner to make a representation and directed that the concerned officer hear the petitioner and decide the merits expeditiously, preferably within thirty days.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 08:30:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>