https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467078 Assessment focused on limitation and monetary threshold for a Section 9 claim: only two invoices fell within the limitation period and their aggregate met the insolvency threshold, so the Adjudicating Authority erred in denying pecuniary jurisdiction. The appellate outcome required conformity with that determination; a bona fide deposit by the corporate debtor covering the amounts within limitation plus interest and reimbursement of IRP expenses was accepted, resulting in setting aside the Section 9 admission, discharge of the IRP, and directions to pay the operational creditor and reimburse incurred IRP costs. en-us Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Mar 2026 19:17:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467078 Assessment focused on limitation and monetary threshold for a Section 9 claim: only two invoices fell within the limitation period and their aggregate met the insolvency threshold, so the Adjudicating Authority erred in denying pecuniary jurisdiction. The appellate outcome required conformity with that determination; a bona fide deposit by the corporate debtor covering the amounts within limitation plus interest and reimbursement of IRP expenses was accepted, resulting in setting aside the Section 9 admission, discharge of the IRP, and directions to pay the operational creditor and reimburse incurred IRP costs. Case-Laws IBC Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467078