<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1680 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467084</link>
    <description>Two revenue additions were addressed: (i) Cash alleged as unexplained under Section 68 - tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation that the cash was received from the husband, supported by sale agreement, affidavits, income-tax returns, bank statements and purchaser confirmations; absent independent contrary evidence, the Section 68 addition was deleted. (ii) Jewellery valuation addition - tribunal accepted affidavits and custody explanations for jewellery as family gifts/streedhan, applied the relevant CBDT instruction and reconciled weights; jewellery attributable to the assessee and relatives was held explained and the addition was deleted. Both assessment adjustments were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 10:12:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1680 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467084</link>
      <description>Two revenue additions were addressed: (i) Cash alleged as unexplained under Section 68 - tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation that the cash was received from the husband, supported by sale agreement, affidavits, income-tax returns, bank statements and purchaser confirmations; absent independent contrary evidence, the Section 68 addition was deleted. (ii) Jewellery valuation addition - tribunal accepted affidavits and custody explanations for jewellery as family gifts/streedhan, applied the relevant CBDT instruction and reconciled weights; jewellery attributable to the assessee and relatives was held explained and the addition was deleted. Both assessment adjustments were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>