<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>HOOKAH. WHETHER FOOD OR OTHER ARTICLE FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120795</link>
    <description>Classification of hookah under the Goods and Services Tax as food or other article for human consumption was queried and an Authority for Advance Ruling (2026 (3) TMI 186) affirmed the original analytical position advanced by the contributor, thereby ratifying that interpretative conclusion on tax classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 10:52:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 13:20:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>HOOKAH. WHETHER FOOD OR OTHER ARTICLE FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120795</link>
      <description>Classification of hookah under the Goods and Services Tax as food or other article for human consumption was queried and an Authority for Advance Ruling (2026 (3) TMI 186) affirmed the original analytical position advanced by the contributor, thereby ratifying that interpretative conclusion on tax classification.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 10:52:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>