<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>HOOKAH. WHETHER FOOD OR OTHER ARTICLE FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120795</link>
    <description>GST classification of hookah was considered on the question whether it is food or another article for human consumption. The discussion notes an advance ruling affirming the view on this classification issue and refers to a subsequent appellate advance-ruling matter concerning the same subject.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 10:52:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 10:38:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>HOOKAH. WHETHER FOOD OR OTHER ARTICLE FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120795</link>
      <description>GST classification of hookah was considered on the question whether it is food or another article for human consumption. The discussion notes an advance ruling affirming the view on this classification issue and refers to a subsequent appellate advance-ruling matter concerning the same subject.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 10:52:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>