<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Finality, Non-Parties and the Discipline of Judicial Hierarchy; A Supreme Court Reminder with Wider Administrative Implications By Adv. G. Jayaprakash, (Former Central Excise Officer)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15968</link>
    <description>The Court reaffirmed that final relief granted and recorded cannot be indirectly disturbed by collateral proceedings involving non parties; non parties retain structured remedies (limited review, fresh tribunal claims, or statutory appeals) but must pursue those procedural routes rather than unsettle settled decisions. Quasi judicial authorities are duty bound to apply binding precedent at first instance; failing to do so shifts the burden of correcting settled law onto affected persons and undermines institutional disciplinary obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 08:41:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 16:26:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Finality, Non-Parties and the Discipline of Judicial Hierarchy; A Supreme Court Reminder with Wider Administrative Implications By Adv. G. Jayaprakash, (Former Central Excise Officer)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15968</link>
      <description>The Court reaffirmed that final relief granted and recorded cannot be indirectly disturbed by collateral proceedings involving non parties; non parties retain structured remedies (limited review, fresh tribunal claims, or statutory appeals) but must pursue those procedural routes rather than unsettle settled decisions. Quasi judicial authorities are duty bound to apply binding precedent at first instance; failing to do so shifts the burden of correcting settled law onto affected persons and undermines institutional disciplinary obligations.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 08:41:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>