<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 154 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787399</link>
    <description>Bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was granted after the Court held that, at the bail stage, only a prima facie assessment was required and a mini trial on the evidentiary value of Section 50 statements, digital chats and diary entries was impermissible. The Court treated the investigation as substantially progressed, noted that the complaint had already been filed, and considered the applicant&#039;s short custody period. Parity with co-accused already enlarged on bail was also treated as a relevant factor. On that basis, the twin conditions under Section 45 were held prima facie satisfied, and bail was allowed subject to stringent conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 08:41:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 154 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787399</link>
      <description>Bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was granted after the Court held that, at the bail stage, only a prima facie assessment was required and a mini trial on the evidentiary value of Section 50 statements, digital chats and diary entries was impermissible. The Court treated the investigation as substantially progressed, noted that the complaint had already been filed, and considered the applicant&#039;s short custody period. Parity with co-accused already enlarged on bail was also treated as a relevant factor. On that basis, the twin conditions under Section 45 were held prima facie satisfied, and bail was allowed subject to stringent conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>