<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 156 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787401</link>
    <description>Whether a general condonation power aimed at Board delays can extend the specially prescribed appeal timeline was addressed: the provision authorising condonation of the Board&#039;s failure to act is confined to regulatory/administrative performance by the Board and does not operate as a general mechanism to enlarge the limitation regime set for appeals. Applying purposive construction and the Code&#039;s scheme, the Tribunal held that that provision cannot override the appeal period and its limited extension; consequently the application to condone the delayed appeal was refused and the appeal rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 08:41:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 156 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787401</link>
      <description>Whether a general condonation power aimed at Board delays can extend the specially prescribed appeal timeline was addressed: the provision authorising condonation of the Board&#039;s failure to act is confined to regulatory/administrative performance by the Board and does not operate as a general mechanism to enlarge the limitation regime set for appeals. Applying purposive construction and the Code&#039;s scheme, the Tribunal held that that provision cannot override the appeal period and its limited extension; consequently the application to condone the delayed appeal was refused and the appeal rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>