https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787404 Quashing of FIR RC2192023E0003: the court concluded that materials gathered in the preliminary enquiry and related records did not disclose a prima facie case of deception or dishonest intention by the company at the inception of transactions, and that the impugned registration risked a roving and fishing inquiry; the judgment emphasised the legal distinction between commercial/business decisions by lenders and criminal conduct requiring proof of fraudulent intent and noted procedural protections for investigations touching public servants, and accordingly quashed the FIR and allowed the writ petition in favour of the petitioner. en-us Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Mar 2026 08:41:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787404 Quashing of FIR RC2192023E0003: the court concluded that materials gathered in the preliminary enquiry and related records did not disclose a prima facie case of deception or dishonest intention by the company at the inception of transactions, and that the impugned registration risked a roving and fishing inquiry; the judgment emphasised the legal distinction between commercial/business decisions by lenders and criminal conduct requiring proof of fraudulent intent and noted procedural protections for investigations touching public servants, and accordingly quashed the FIR and allowed the writ petition in favour of the petitioner. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787404