<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 160 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787405</link>
    <description>Condition No. 104 of Notification No. 21/2002-Customs grants conditional exemption to imported aircraft for non-scheduled passenger or charter services; the legal question was whether an aircraft imported for non-scheduled passenger service forfeits exemption when used for non-scheduled charter service. Applying the larger bench precedent in VRL Logistics, the principle of interchangeability governs: non-scheduled passenger use may encompass non-scheduled charter use absent cancellation of civil aviation approval and the customs authority may not re-examine DGCA approval. The impugned order denying exemption, demanding duty, confiscating the aircraft and levying penalties was set aside and exemption upheld for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 08:41:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 160 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787405</link>
      <description>Condition No. 104 of Notification No. 21/2002-Customs grants conditional exemption to imported aircraft for non-scheduled passenger or charter services; the legal question was whether an aircraft imported for non-scheduled passenger service forfeits exemption when used for non-scheduled charter service. Applying the larger bench precedent in VRL Logistics, the principle of interchangeability governs: non-scheduled passenger use may encompass non-scheduled charter use absent cancellation of civil aviation approval and the customs authority may not re-examine DGCA approval. The impugned order denying exemption, demanding duty, confiscating the aircraft and levying penalties was set aside and exemption upheld for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>