<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 172 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787417</link>
    <description>Issue: whether reassessment under general reassessment provisions was valid when incriminating documents seized in a search of a third party related to the assessee. Principle applied: the statutory non obstante clause creates a special procedure for search linked cases requiring invocation of the search specific assessment route where seized material pertains to persons other than the searched party. Outcome: on the facts the assessing officer initially invoked the special route but then pursued general reassessment; that procedure was held inapplicable and the reopening under the general provisions was void for lack of jurisdiction, with the notice and consequential actions quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 08:41:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 172 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787417</link>
      <description>Issue: whether reassessment under general reassessment provisions was valid when incriminating documents seized in a search of a third party related to the assessee. Principle applied: the statutory non obstante clause creates a special procedure for search linked cases requiring invocation of the search specific assessment route where seized material pertains to persons other than the searched party. Outcome: on the facts the assessing officer initially invoked the special route but then pursued general reassessment; that procedure was held inapplicable and the reopening under the general provisions was void for lack of jurisdiction, with the notice and consequential actions quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>