<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 194 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787439</link>
    <description>Whether assignment of long-term (95-year) leasehold rights constitutes a taxable supply under the Maharashtra GST framework was analysed by reference to the scope of supply (Section 7(1)) and Schedule II (land/building transactions). The court treated the transaction as an extinguishment and transfer of benefits arising out of immovable property, relied on analogous reasoning in prior high-court authority and on the relevance of a nil-rate notification for certain long-term leases, and found no requisite nexus with the transferor&#039;s business; accordingly the assignment is not a supply of services attracting GST and the impugned assessment order was quashed with the writ allowed for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 08:41:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 194 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787439</link>
      <description>Whether assignment of long-term (95-year) leasehold rights constitutes a taxable supply under the Maharashtra GST framework was analysed by reference to the scope of supply (Section 7(1)) and Schedule II (land/building transactions). The court treated the transaction as an extinguishment and transfer of benefits arising out of immovable property, relied on analogous reasoning in prior high-court authority and on the relevance of a nil-rate notification for certain long-term leases, and found no requisite nexus with the transferor&#039;s business; accordingly the assignment is not a supply of services attracting GST and the impugned assessment order was quashed with the writ allowed for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>