<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax withholding certificate challenged for failure to apply precedent; authority ordered to issue a reduced treaty-based deduction certificate.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97406</link>
    <description>Petition challenges a Competent Authority withholding certificate applying a treaty-based higher withholding rate to a non-resident US company; the authority failed to apply the settled precedent and did not record reasons for the elevated rate, rendering the certificate unsustainable. The court rejected Revenue submissions that assessment-stage scrutiny justified the certificate, held the absence of proper precedent application and reasoning was decisive, and directed issuance of a reduced treaty-based deduction certificate for the relevant year to mitigate undue withholding while permitting substantive tax scrutiny later.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 08:41:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 08:41:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax withholding certificate challenged for failure to apply precedent; authority ordered to issue a reduced treaty-based deduction certificate.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97406</link>
      <description>Petition challenges a Competent Authority withholding certificate applying a treaty-based higher withholding rate to a non-resident US company; the authority failed to apply the settled precedent and did not record reasons for the elevated rate, rendering the certificate unsustainable. The court rejected Revenue submissions that assessment-stage scrutiny justified the certificate, held the absence of proper precedent application and reasoning was decisive, and directed issuance of a reduced treaty-based deduction certificate for the relevant year to mitigate undue withholding while permitting substantive tax scrutiny later.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 08:41:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>