<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1639 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467038</link>
    <description>Service tax liability was sustained after finding deliberate non-compliance and suppression with intent to evade, permitting extended limitation for the demand. Interest on delayed payment, penalty for suppression-related contraventions, and late fees for non-filing or delayed filing of returns were consequently upheld. CENVAT credit adjustment was rejected because the credit claim was not reflected in prescribed ST-3 returns or supported by timely statutory intimations, and the applicable procedural conditions and time limits were not met. Amounts already deposited were appropriated against the confirmed service tax, interest, penalty and late-fee dues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 12:50:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1639 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467038</link>
      <description>Service tax liability was sustained after finding deliberate non-compliance and suppression with intent to evade, permitting extended limitation for the demand. Interest on delayed payment, penalty for suppression-related contraventions, and late fees for non-filing or delayed filing of returns were consequently upheld. CENVAT credit adjustment was rejected because the credit claim was not reflected in prescribed ST-3 returns or supported by timely statutory intimations, and the applicable procedural conditions and time limits were not met. Amounts already deposited were appropriated against the confirmed service tax, interest, penalty and late-fee dues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>