<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1639 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467038</link>
    <description>The article examines sustainment of service tax demand and related fiscal liabilities where procedural non-compliance with Cenvat Credit rules is alleged. It explains that Cenvat credit entitlement depends on prescribed return filings and ledger entries; absence of ST-3 entries or timely intimations defeats credit adjustment. Statutory provisions on extended limitation for suppression, interest for delayed payment, mandatory penalty for suppression, and late fee for non/late filing are applied where facts indicate deliberate non-compliance. It also notes the lawful appropriation of deposits against quantified dues. The piece emphasises procedural proof and time bar rules as determinative for credit claims and liability enforcement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 12:50:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1639 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467038</link>
      <description>The article examines sustainment of service tax demand and related fiscal liabilities where procedural non-compliance with Cenvat Credit rules is alleged. It explains that Cenvat credit entitlement depends on prescribed return filings and ledger entries; absence of ST-3 entries or timely intimations defeats credit adjustment. Statutory provisions on extended limitation for suppression, interest for delayed payment, mandatory penalty for suppression, and late fee for non/late filing are applied where facts indicate deliberate non-compliance. It also notes the lawful appropriation of deposits against quantified dues. The piece emphasises procedural proof and time bar rules as determinative for credit claims and liability enforcement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>