<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 133 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50407</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) in a case concerning the classification of chillers manufactured by the appellants. The Tribunal held that the review order introduced new points not raised in the show cause notice, exceeding the revisionary authority&#039;s power under Section 35E of the Central Excise Act. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the revisionary authority cannot introduce fresh grounds beyond the record of the proceedings. As a result, the appeal was allowed solely on procedural grounds without addressing the merits of the product&#039;s classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:10:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 133 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50407</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) in a case concerning the classification of chillers manufactured by the appellants. The Tribunal held that the review order introduced new points not raised in the show cause notice, exceeding the revisionary authority&#039;s power under Section 35E of the Central Excise Act. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the revisionary authority cannot introduce fresh grounds beyond the record of the proceedings. As a result, the appeal was allowed solely on procedural grounds without addressing the merits of the product&#039;s classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>