<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 273 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50403</link>
    <description>Slag arising in the manufacture of blooms and billets was held not liable to excise duty because it was merely thrown away residue, had no recoverable metal, and lacked excisable character. The Tribunal treated the earlier sale of slag for metal recovery as distinguishable and followed prior decisions that similar slag from iron and steel manufacture was not dutiable absent a marketable excisable product. The appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 14:57:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 273 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50403</link>
      <description>Slag arising in the manufacture of blooms and billets was held not liable to excise duty because it was merely thrown away residue, had no recoverable metal, and lacked excisable character. The Tribunal treated the earlier sale of slag for metal recovery as distinguishable and followed prior decisions that similar slag from iron and steel manufacture was not dutiable absent a marketable excisable product. The appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>