<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 112 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787357</link>
    <description>Market survey alone cannot justify enhancement of imported goods&#039; assessable value unless the statutory valuation sequence under section 14 and Rule 7 is properly established with contemporaneous import data and comparability factors. A product retains its tariff classification by its essential character, so a walking stick with an incidental torch feature remained classifiable under CTI 6602 0000 and was not treated as a luminaire under CTI 9405 4900. Once valuation enhancement and reclassification failed, the associated confiscation, redemption fine and penalties under the Customs Act could not survive, and the BIS-based objection linked to the rejected heading also fell away.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 08:42:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 112 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787357</link>
      <description>Market survey alone cannot justify enhancement of imported goods&#039; assessable value unless the statutory valuation sequence under section 14 and Rule 7 is properly established with contemporaneous import data and comparability factors. A product retains its tariff classification by its essential character, so a walking stick with an incidental torch feature remained classifiable under CTI 6602 0000 and was not treated as a luminaire under CTI 9405 4900. Once valuation enhancement and reclassification failed, the associated confiscation, redemption fine and penalties under the Customs Act could not survive, and the BIS-based objection linked to the rejected heading also fell away.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>