<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Onus to Prove Genuineness of Share Transactions: documentary proof can rebut suspicion and protect 10(38) LTCG exemption.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97371</link>
    <description>The article addresses the burden to prove genuineness of share transactions claimed as exempt LTCG under 10(38), holding that documentary records (contract notes, demat statements, bank payment/receipt evidence and exchange trades) can discharge the onus and defeat additions. It states that reliance on investigation reports, prima facie anomalies in company accounts, or extraordinary price movement, without material linking the taxpayer to price manipulation, recycling of funds or accommodation entries, is insufficient to treat exempt gains as unexplained income; therefore the exemption should be accepted absent direct nexus or corroborative inquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 08:42:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 08:42:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Onus to Prove Genuineness of Share Transactions: documentary proof can rebut suspicion and protect 10(38) LTCG exemption.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97371</link>
      <description>The article addresses the burden to prove genuineness of share transactions claimed as exempt LTCG under 10(38), holding that documentary records (contract notes, demat statements, bank payment/receipt evidence and exchange trades) can discharge the onus and defeat additions. It states that reliance on investigation reports, prima facie anomalies in company accounts, or extraordinary price movement, without material linking the taxpayer to price manipulation, recycling of funds or accommodation entries, is insufficient to treat exempt gains as unexplained income; therefore the exemption should be accepted absent direct nexus or corroborative inquiry.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 08:42:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>