<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1634 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467025</link>
    <description>Section 149 of the Customs Act permits post-export amendment of shipping bills, including conversion from free shipping bills to drawback shipping bills, where the request is supported by documentary evidence that existed at the time of export. A Board circular cannot curtail that statutory power or impose a time bar not found in the Act, and delay alone is not a valid basis to refuse amendment when contemporaneous records such as shipping bills, ARE-1 forms and bank realisation documents support the claim. Rejection of drawback on the ground of non-compliance with Rule 13(1)(a) of the Drawback Rules is likewise unsustainable where the real issue is whether the statutory amendment criteria are met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 18:36:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1634 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467025</link>
      <description>Section 149 of the Customs Act permits post-export amendment of shipping bills, including conversion from free shipping bills to drawback shipping bills, where the request is supported by documentary evidence that existed at the time of export. A Board circular cannot curtail that statutory power or impose a time bar not found in the Act, and delay alone is not a valid basis to refuse amendment when contemporaneous records such as shipping bills, ARE-1 forms and bank realisation documents support the claim. Rejection of drawback on the ground of non-compliance with Rule 13(1)(a) of the Drawback Rules is likewise unsustainable where the real issue is whether the statutory amendment criteria are met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>