<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1593 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467027</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;sufficient cause&quot; for condonation of delay under Section 253(5) of the Income-tax Act is to be construed liberally to advance substantial justice. Delay should not be rejected merely because it is delayed unless the explanation shows mala fides, negligence, or dilatory conduct. On that approach, and in view of natural justice, the 102-day delay in filing the appeal before the first appellate authority was condoned, and the matter was restored for disposal on merits after hearing the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 18:36:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1593 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467027</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;sufficient cause&quot; for condonation of delay under Section 253(5) of the Income-tax Act is to be construed liberally to advance substantial justice. Delay should not be rejected merely because it is delayed unless the explanation shows mala fides, negligence, or dilatory conduct. On that approach, and in view of natural justice, the 102-day delay in filing the appeal before the first appellate authority was condoned, and the matter was restored for disposal on merits after hearing the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>