<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Zero-rated exports: E-way bill expiry from transport breakdown precludes imposition of penalty under Section 129(1)(a).</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97349</link>
    <description>Where exported goods are zero rated and no tax is payable, a procedural contravention of Rule 138 (expiry of an E-way bill) without evidence of intent to evade tax does not support computation or imposition of penalty under Section 129(1)(a). Applying Coordinate Bench reasoning, the expiry caused by a vehicular breakdown shortly before interception was a transport mishap and not a tax-evasion device; therefore harsh penal consequences under Section 129(3) were unsustainable. The impugned APL 04 orders were quashed and the penal amount was directed to be refunded with interest within twelve weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 15:54:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 15:54:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Zero-rated exports: E-way bill expiry from transport breakdown precludes imposition of penalty under Section 129(1)(a).</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97349</link>
      <description>Where exported goods are zero rated and no tax is payable, a procedural contravention of Rule 138 (expiry of an E-way bill) without evidence of intent to evade tax does not support computation or imposition of penalty under Section 129(1)(a). Applying Coordinate Bench reasoning, the expiry caused by a vehicular breakdown shortly before interception was a transport mishap and not a tax-evasion device; therefore harsh penal consequences under Section 129(3) were unsustainable. The impugned APL 04 orders were quashed and the penal amount was directed to be refunded with interest within twelve weeks.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 15:54:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>