<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Mandatory pre-deposit requirement upheld; failure to deposit and unexplained delay led to dismissal of writ petition.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97347</link>
    <description>High Court considered mandatory pre-deposit as a condition for entertaining a statutory appeal and found petitioner failed to comply despite personal hearings and specific directions, reflecting adversely on petitioner&#039;s conduct; combined with an unexplained and unreasonable delay in filing a writ challenging the appellate order, the court applied the doctrine that writs must be filed within a reasonable time and declined interference. Reliance was placed on relevant Supreme Court authorities regarding delay and laches. Writ petition dismissed for lack of merit due to non-deposit and inordinate delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 15:53:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 15:53:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Mandatory pre-deposit requirement upheld; failure to deposit and unexplained delay led to dismissal of writ petition.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97347</link>
      <description>High Court considered mandatory pre-deposit as a condition for entertaining a statutory appeal and found petitioner failed to comply despite personal hearings and specific directions, reflecting adversely on petitioner&#039;s conduct; combined with an unexplained and unreasonable delay in filing a writ challenging the appellate order, the court applied the doctrine that writs must be filed within a reasonable time and declined interference. Reliance was placed on relevant Supreme Court authorities regarding delay and laches. Writ petition dismissed for lack of merit due to non-deposit and inordinate delay.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 15:53:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>