<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Non-Deduction of Tax at Source not a standalone ground for disallowance where payments are genuine reimbursements with supporting evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97339</link>
    <description>Disallowance of salary expenses was reversed where the taxpayer produced employee-wise breakup, designations, locations and salary details and no evidence of sham payments or diversion of funds was shown; AO&#039;s salary disallowance deleted. Non-deduction of tax at source on cross-border/reimbursement payments was held not to be a standalone ground for disallowance where payments were characterised as reimbursements, supported by particulars and did not prima facie attract TDS; 40(a)(i) addition deleted. Addition for alleged undisclosed receipts was deleted after the assessee furnished corresponding receipt particulars and TDS credit documentation, and Revenue produced no contrary proof. Appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 15:43:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 15:43:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Non-Deduction of Tax at Source not a standalone ground for disallowance where payments are genuine reimbursements with supporting evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97339</link>
      <description>Disallowance of salary expenses was reversed where the taxpayer produced employee-wise breakup, designations, locations and salary details and no evidence of sham payments or diversion of funds was shown; AO&#039;s salary disallowance deleted. Non-deduction of tax at source on cross-border/reimbursement payments was held not to be a standalone ground for disallowance where payments were characterised as reimbursements, supported by particulars and did not prima facie attract TDS; 40(a)(i) addition deleted. Addition for alleged undisclosed receipts was deleted after the assessee furnished corresponding receipt particulars and TDS credit documentation, and Revenue produced no contrary proof. Appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 15:43:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>