<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 143 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50387</link>
    <description>Free allotment of goods manufactured by the assessee to dealers was treated as admissible trade discount under section 4 because the discount was supported by circulars and chartered accountant&#039;s certificates and was granted uniformly, making it a quantity discount in kind. By contrast, the cost of goods not manufactured by the assessee, including cosmetics and similar items given as sales-promotion incentives, was not excludible from assessable value. The broader objection relating to damaged-display goods did not defeat the manufactured-goods discount, but the exclusion for non-manufactured goods was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:41:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 143 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50387</link>
      <description>Free allotment of goods manufactured by the assessee to dealers was treated as admissible trade discount under section 4 because the discount was supported by circulars and chartered accountant&#039;s certificates and was granted uniformly, making it a quantity discount in kind. By contrast, the cost of goods not manufactured by the assessee, including cosmetics and similar items given as sales-promotion incentives, was not excludible from assessable value. The broader objection relating to damaged-display goods did not defeat the manufactured-goods discount, but the exclusion for non-manufactured goods was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>