<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 131 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50385</link>
    <description>Excisable goods intercepted while being unloaded from the assessee&#039;s van, without any invoice or duty-paying document, supported a finding of clandestine removal from the factory. The surrounding circumstances and the driver&#039;s statement shifted the burden to the assessee to prove lawful clearance on payment of duty, which it failed to do. The confiscation and penalty were therefore sustained, while the redemption fine on the goods and the van was reduced as excessive on the facts. The absence of confirmation of the duty demand did not disturb the clandestine removal finding, in the absence of a Revenue challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:37:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 131 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50385</link>
      <description>Excisable goods intercepted while being unloaded from the assessee&#039;s van, without any invoice or duty-paying document, supported a finding of clandestine removal from the factory. The surrounding circumstances and the driver&#039;s statement shifted the burden to the assessee to prove lawful clearance on payment of duty, which it failed to do. The confiscation and penalty were therefore sustained, while the redemption fine on the goods and the van was reduced as excessive on the facts. The absence of confirmation of the duty demand did not disturb the clandestine removal finding, in the absence of a Revenue challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>