<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Contractual bar on pre-award interest prevails; post-award interest allowed but rate reduced for lack of reasons.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97312</link>
    <description>The article addresses contractual bars to pre-award (pendente lite) interest and the scope of post-award interest under Section 31(7). It explains that an express contractual prohibition on interest prevails over an arbitral award, applying ejusdem generis to reject attempts to characterise prohibited interest as &#039;compensation&#039;, and concludes pendente lite awards contrary to clause-based bars are liable to be set aside. It further explains that post-award interest under Section 31(7)(b) is payable despite pre-award bars, but a tribunal&#039;s unreasoned fixation of rate may be judicially moderated; the rate awarded was reduced on that basis. Judicial interference under limited review provisions was held justified on these points.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 13:12:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 13:12:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Contractual bar on pre-award interest prevails; post-award interest allowed but rate reduced for lack of reasons.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97312</link>
      <description>The article addresses contractual bars to pre-award (pendente lite) interest and the scope of post-award interest under Section 31(7). It explains that an express contractual prohibition on interest prevails over an arbitral award, applying ejusdem generis to reject attempts to characterise prohibited interest as &#039;compensation&#039;, and concludes pendente lite awards contrary to clause-based bars are liable to be set aside. It further explains that post-award interest under Section 31(7)(b) is payable despite pre-award bars, but a tribunal&#039;s unreasoned fixation of rate may be judicially moderated; the rate awarded was reduced on that basis. Judicial interference under limited review provisions was held justified on these points.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 13:12:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>