<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 95 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787340</link>
    <description>When an adjudicating order directs reconsideration and reconstitution of the committee of creditors, earlier interlocutory records of the superseded constitution merge into and are displaced by the reconsideration process, and appeals against those interlocutory records do not survive; procedural orders recording confirmation of an interim resolution professional are not set aside absent a separate challenge where claim admission and voting have been revisited and remain subject to fresh proceedings; any dispute over claim admissibility or alleged connivance must be pursued in the pending reconstitution-related application rather than in these appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 08:36:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 95 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787340</link>
      <description>When an adjudicating order directs reconsideration and reconstitution of the committee of creditors, earlier interlocutory records of the superseded constitution merge into and are displaced by the reconsideration process, and appeals against those interlocutory records do not survive; procedural orders recording confirmation of an interim resolution professional are not set aside absent a separate challenge where claim admission and voting have been revisited and remain subject to fresh proceedings; any dispute over claim admissibility or alleged connivance must be pursued in the pending reconstitution-related application rather than in these appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>