<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 164 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50382</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower order in a customs dispute, finding the Review application time-barred under Section 129D of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner of Customs&#039; direction for further determination was beyond the prescribed period, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Emphasizing the importance of the decision date for the limitation period, the Tribunal clarified that communication of an order is not relevant. The decision focused on procedural compliance, highlighting the significance of timely actions in customs-related disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:29:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 164 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50382</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower order in a customs dispute, finding the Review application time-barred under Section 129D of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner of Customs&#039; direction for further determination was beyond the prescribed period, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Emphasizing the importance of the decision date for the limitation period, the Tribunal clarified that communication of an order is not relevant. The decision focused on procedural compliance, highlighting the significance of timely actions in customs-related disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>