<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 22 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787267</link>
    <description>Approval of a resolution plan under the insolvency regime extinguishes claims not included in the plan, so pending appellate proceedings concerning those claims cannot continue. Applying this principle and Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, the appellate tribunal became functus officio in respect of the matters covered by the appeal. The proceedings could not be pursued on merits after the plan&#039;s approval, and the appeal ceased to survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 08:34:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 22 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787267</link>
      <description>Approval of a resolution plan under the insolvency regime extinguishes claims not included in the plan, so pending appellate proceedings concerning those claims cannot continue. Applying this principle and Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, the appellate tribunal became functus officio in respect of the matters covered by the appeal. The proceedings could not be pursued on merits after the plan&#039;s approval, and the appeal ceased to survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>