<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 206 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the Customs House Agent (CHA) for discrepancies in goods described in the shipping bill, as the appellant had no prior knowledge of the non-conforming goods and was not implicated in the illegal export scheme. The appellant was given the benefit of the doubt due to the lack of conclusive evidence, resulting in the appeal being disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:18:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 206 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the Customs House Agent (CHA) for discrepancies in goods described in the shipping bill, as the appellant had no prior knowledge of the non-conforming goods and was not implicated in the illegal export scheme. The appellant was given the benefit of the doubt due to the lack of conclusive evidence, resulting in the appeal being disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>