https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787275 Provisional attachment of property under money-laundering proceedings was upheld because the appellant failed to produce credible documentary proof of the lawful source of the purchase funds. The claimed friendly loan and savings or stridhan were not supported by bank records or a loan agreement, and statements recorded in the investigation denied the alleged loan and indicated routing of funds through intermediaries. The ex parte objection also failed because notice had been duly served, no one appeared for the appellant, and the adjudication was completed within the statutory framework without procedural illegality. The confirmation of attachment was therefore maintained. en-us Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Mar 2026 08:34:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787275 Provisional attachment of property under money-laundering proceedings was upheld because the appellant failed to produce credible documentary proof of the lawful source of the purchase funds. The claimed friendly loan and savings or stridhan were not supported by bank records or a loan agreement, and statements recorded in the investigation denied the alleged loan and indicated routing of funds through intermediaries. The ex parte objection also failed because notice had been duly served, no one appeared for the appellant, and the adjudication was completed within the statutory framework without procedural illegality. The confirmation of attachment was therefore maintained. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787275