<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 48 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787293</link>
    <description>Extended limitation under Section 28(4) applies only where non-levy or short-levy results from collusion or deliberate wilful suppression intended to evade duty; mere misclassification, bona fide belief in tariff classification based on supplier documents, or payment of differential duty before show cause notices does not establish such intent. Self-assessment obligations do not automatically convert classification disputes into willful suppression because officers must also scrutinize declarations. On these facts there was insufficient material of deliberate suppression; therefore invocation of the extended period and consequent confiscation and penalty were unsustainable and set aside, with the appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 08:34:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 48 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787293</link>
      <description>Extended limitation under Section 28(4) applies only where non-levy or short-levy results from collusion or deliberate wilful suppression intended to evade duty; mere misclassification, bona fide belief in tariff classification based on supplier documents, or payment of differential duty before show cause notices does not establish such intent. Self-assessment obligations do not automatically convert classification disputes into willful suppression because officers must also scrutinize declarations. On these facts there was insufficient material of deliberate suppression; therefore invocation of the extended period and consequent confiscation and penalty were unsustainable and set aside, with the appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>