https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787296 Appeal was dismissed for inordinate delay where a 150 day delay lacked sufficient explanation, establishing that unexplained delay permits dismissal; separately, on the identical classification issue the earlier adverse ruling was applied and the challenged classification of Interactive Flat Panel Displays was not sustained against the Revenue, resulting in dismissal on merits. The operative effects are that unexplained appellate delay will bar relief and that identical, recently decided adverse precedents on product classification will be followed to determine classification disputes. en-us Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Mar 2026 08:34:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787296 Appeal was dismissed for inordinate delay where a 150 day delay lacked sufficient explanation, establishing that unexplained delay permits dismissal; separately, on the identical classification issue the earlier adverse ruling was applied and the challenged classification of Interactive Flat Panel Displays was not sustained against the Revenue, resulting in dismissal on merits. The operative effects are that unexplained appellate delay will bar relief and that identical, recently decided adverse precedents on product classification will be followed to determine classification disputes. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787296