<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 55 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787300</link>
    <description>Capital gains exemption was held available where the taxpayer invested sale proceeds by paying for a plot, architect fees and advances and commenced construction within the statutory window; the Tribunal applied the statutory scheme treating amounts utilised or deposited as cost of the new asset and relied on precedents holding that payment of advances and commencement of construction constitute utilisation. The Tribunal found factual proof of provisional allotment, payments and commencement of works and distinguished completion within three years from the requirement that capital gains be utilised or deposited within the period; accordingly the assessing officer&#039;s addition was deleted and the appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 55 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787300</link>
      <description>Capital gains exemption was held available where the taxpayer invested sale proceeds by paying for a plot, architect fees and advances and commenced construction within the statutory window; the Tribunal applied the statutory scheme treating amounts utilised or deposited as cost of the new asset and relied on precedents holding that payment of advances and commencement of construction constitute utilisation. The Tribunal found factual proof of provisional allotment, payments and commencement of works and distinguished completion within three years from the requirement that capital gains be utilised or deposited within the period; accordingly the assessing officer&#039;s addition was deleted and the appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>