<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 72 - GSTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787317</link>
    <description>The note addresses whether a supplier failed to pass on input tax credit in breach of Section 171 CGST; an investigation under Rules 128-129 applying the approved methodology found no additional ITC benefit accrued to the supplier requiring pass through, the complainant consented to the investigative report, and the complaint was dismissed with proceedings closed. The operative principle stated is that where no additional benefit accrues to the supplier post GST, anti profiteering action under Section 171 is not warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 08:34:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 72 - GSTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787317</link>
      <description>The note addresses whether a supplier failed to pass on input tax credit in breach of Section 171 CGST; an investigation under Rules 128-129 applying the approved methodology found no additional ITC benefit accrued to the supplier requiring pass through, the complainant consented to the investigative report, and the complaint was dismissed with proceedings closed. The operative principle stated is that where no additional benefit accrues to the supplier post GST, anti profiteering action under Section 171 is not warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>