https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466997 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is available despite an arbitration clause where the remedy is ineffective or natural justice issues arise; petitions were maintainable. Banning orders lacked a real and adequate opportunity to be heard and relied on post hoc reasons introduced after issuance; such defects invalidate administrative debarments. A contractual twelve month bar applied only upon termination, which was not established, and penalties already imposed meant the additional debarment was disproportionate and risked double punishment. Consequently the one year bans were unsustainable and quashed, and the petitions allowed without costs. en-us Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Feb 2026 14:56:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466997 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is available despite an arbitration clause where the remedy is ineffective or natural justice issues arise; petitions were maintainable. Banning orders lacked a real and adequate opportunity to be heard and relied on post hoc reasons introduced after issuance; such defects invalidate administrative debarments. A contractual twelve month bar applied only upon termination, which was not established, and penalties already imposed meant the additional debarment was disproportionate and risked double punishment. Consequently the one year bans were unsustainable and quashed, and the petitions allowed without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466997