<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1488 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467005</link>
    <description>Accepted sales preclude disallowance of the entire value of alleged non-genuine purchases; only the embedded profit element may be taxed. The Tribunal treated reliance on an authority concerning hotel maintenance expenditure as distinguishable from a trading-purchase dispute. Although the taxpayer could not conclusively establish purchases due to missing transport receipts and supplier confirmations, the facts supported a reasonable estimate rather than a 100% disallowance. Considering the nature of the trading business and the available evidence, the disallowance was restricted to 8% of the disputed purchases, with income to be recomputed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 10:28:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1488 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467005</link>
      <description>Accepted sales preclude disallowance of the entire value of alleged non-genuine purchases; only the embedded profit element may be taxed. The Tribunal treated reliance on an authority concerning hotel maintenance expenditure as distinguishable from a trading-purchase dispute. Although the taxpayer could not conclusively establish purchases due to missing transport receipts and supplier confirmations, the facts supported a reasonable estimate rather than a 100% disallowance. Considering the nature of the trading business and the available evidence, the disallowance was restricted to 8% of the disputed purchases, with income to be recomputed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>