https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466989 Concurrent findings on title and encroachment are not disturbed under Article 136 absent perversity, illegality, or other exceptional error; the challenge on that ground failed. Section 51 of the Transfer of Property Act protects only a transferee who improves property in good faith under defective title, so an encroacher without title cannot invoke it to resist demolition or recovery of possession. Estoppel and acquiescence also require clear pleading and proof of representation, reliance, and change of position; mere delay was insufficient. The decree directing demolition and delivery of possession was restored. en-us Thu, 02 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Feb 2026 15:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466989 Concurrent findings on title and encroachment are not disturbed under Article 136 absent perversity, illegality, or other exceptional error; the challenge on that ground failed. Section 51 of the Transfer of Property Act protects only a transferee who improves property in good faith under defective title, so an encroacher without title cannot invoke it to resist demolition or recovery of possession. Estoppel and acquiescence also require clear pleading and proof of representation, reliance, and change of position; mere delay was insufficient. The decree directing demolition and delivery of possession was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466989